Showing posts with label OUGD401. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OUGD401. Show all posts

Monday, 6 May 2013

OUGD401: SELF-EVALUATION FORM



OUGD401: CRITICAL WRITING - Chronologies & Contexts



‘Advertising doesn’t sell things; all advertising does is change the way people think or feel’ (Jermemy Bullmore). Evaluate this statement with reference to selected critical theories (past and present).

With more than $500 billion a year being spent on advertisements worldwide it is clear to see the sheer power in which this manipulating business upholds. Whether it’s being splashed all over our TV screens or plastered on almost every bus which happens to pass, advertising has almost become the ‘Simon says’ of our commercially led lives, led into believing that what we own is what we are, or realistically what we own Is what we want to be. I’m going to explore and evaluate Bullmores statement ‘Advertising doesn’t sell things; all advertising does is change the way people think or feel’, and highlight the factors which show advertising in its realistic state, and how the idyllic lifestyle portrayed to us is a clever way of manipulation.

In the 19th century developments in technology introduced mass large- scale coloured printing, which created a boom in company advertising. Companies figured they could use the intellectual and high class nature of fine art to speak to their customers in a manner which promoted their products as great quality and reliable. Advertisers realised that they could start to manipulate paintings for their benefit. Here’s a quote which relates to the reproduction of fine art on different mediums and on different scales, ‘Because paintings are silent and still and their meaning is no longer attached to them, but has become transmittable, paintings lend themselves to easy manipulation, they can be used to make arguments or points which can be very different to their original meanings.  (Ways of Seeing, 1972) Bergers arguing the debate that paintings create such meaning when stood in their atmospheric context that taking the painting out of this environment can give it a whole different meaning. One company which took advantage of the benefits of this mass printing was Lever Bros. who manufactured soap. They took Albert Taylors A Dress Rehearsal (1888)(see fig 1)(which depicts a bride wearing her mother’s passed down wedding dress), renamed it As Good As New to show their soap can transform old linen to be ‘as good as new’. So through this manipulation of imagery advertises could successfully change the mind set of what their customers thought about, before purchasing.

Fast forward into the 21st century and advertising is the leader of our consumer culture. The portrayal of its ever so glamorous lifestyle tricks us into believing the better life is achievable through the purchasing of goods which we think are a necessity. Sexuality is one area which publicity is very reliant on. The ideology that purchasing a product may enhance your sexuality, or make you seem as appealable as the man and/or woman in the advert. ‘Publicity increasingly uses sexuality to sell any product or service’ Bergers, J (1972), page 144. A truthful statement here by Bergers, in this day and age it’s all about how you look and how others see you, an attempt at creating a fake alter ego for yourself to fall into. Take for example this women’s perfume advert by Yves Saint Laurent (2009)(see fig 2). The advert connotes a scene in which the woman (Kate Moss) I in a car, presumably leaving her lovers apartment, with the memories of her night being reminded to her by the smell of a rose. The advert uses a whole set of symbolic and sexual references, the rose imitating the romance and the perfume itself, an indicating that the perfume has provoked the spell of love, the erotic and fleshly flashbacks in which the beautiful model is reminiscing and the mysterious and anonymous identity of the male lover in his French apartment, adding to the romantic and heart aching fantasy. The advert throws out these symbolic references putting forward to the viewer the idea that the perfume is linked with passion and love, constructing the idea in the customers head that using this perfume is the instigator of romance, and by wearing the product you can also be as desirable as the model. From Judith Williams, Decoding Advertising which can be compared to the perfume, ‘Diamonds may be marketed by likening them to eternal love, creating a symbolism where the mineral means something not on its own terms, as a rock, but in human terms, as assign, thus a diamond comes to ‘mean’ love and endurance’. Williamson, j (1978), page 12. The perfume I the advert almost takes on the role of the diamond, changing its meaning from a bottled liquid to a fragrance of affection. A lot of high-end brand advertisement for products such as perfume and clothing can be very manipulative, playing on the fact that everyone would love to live a wealthy way of life, allowing the customer to think, if they purchase this product they two can delve into the fantasy lifestyle of the rich.

Although envying the rich and famous and buying into high-end brands is reassuring to the public that they are not far off being any different from their most beloved celebrity, the realistic chance of them ever getting famous is very unlikely. This is where advertisement plays a big part in controlling what people purchase for the benefit and guarantee that they fit in with society and live a supposedly perfect lifestyle.’ Thus instead of being identified by what they produce, people are mad to identify themselves with what they consume’ Williamson, J (1978), page 13. It’s far from just high-end brands selling luxury products, almost any retailer will sell a brand in a manner which changes the way you think about their products. We are always being offered an alternative lifestyle, an imaginary one which is seemingly a purchase away, and with it being so easy to spend our hard earned money, people are so easily pressured into buying into the consumer way of life. ‘We feel the need to belong, to have a ‘social’ place, it can be hard to find. Instead we may be given an imaginary one.’ Williams, J (1978), page 13. It’s not our intention to nip to the shop and buy say a new car, but the clever way in which language and imagery is used can easily shape our thoughts on what we purchase. ‘The more convincing publicity conveys the pleasure of bathing in a warm, distant sea, the more the spectator/ buyer will become aware that he is hundreds of miles away from that sea and the more the remote chance of bathing in it will seem to him. This is why publicity can never really afford to be about the product or the opportunity it is proposing to the buyer who is not yet enjoying iy’ Berger, J (1972), page 144. Customers are easily fooled by being shown how their life could apparently be improved with unnecessary items, shown to them as a necessity and an improvement to their ‘envied’ lifestyle.

Adverts only ever reflect on the advantages of a product and only ever highlighting the benefits of it on your part, adverts play on the realism of the subject that is being advertised. ‘Publicity is effective precisely because it feeds upon the real. Clothes, foods, cars, cosmetics, baths and sunshine are real things to be enjoyed in themselves.’ Berger, J (1972), page 132. Using these real possessions an advert then clearly underlines the highpoints of what the item has to offer, again going back to the perfume advert, the way in which items are used as symbol of emotion or of something precious to make it more appealing to the customer.

The social relation of these products plays a huge part in selling goods. ‘Publicity is about social relation not objects’ Berger, J (1972), page 132. One reason for wanting an item of clothing or a bottle of perfume or a fancy car is not only because you envy a celebrity lifestyle portrayed in an advert, it’s because you subconsciously want social acceptance, be it by your friends, family or strangers. ‘Without social envy glamour can’t exist’ (ways of seeing, 1972) Glamourizing products which aren’t necessarily important is vital for advertising to work. Again it comes back to the imaginary way of life which is being sold to us, envying a glamourized image of what you want to be if you purchase a certain product. ‘The spectator/ buyer is meant to envy herself as she will become if she buys the product’ Bergers, J (1972), page 134. Having this attitude convinces customers to purchase what is deemed a necessity, replacing it for an item which is a necessity. ‘It works because it works of genuine ‘use-value’, besides needing social meaning we obviously do need material goods. Advertising gives those goods social meaning so that two needs are crossed, and neither is adequately fulfilled. Material things that we need are made to represent other non-material things we need: the point of exchange between the two is where ‘meaning’ is created’ Williamson, J (1978), page 14.

‘Advertising rather provides a structure which is capable of transforming the language of objects to that of people, and vice versa’ Williamson, J (1978), page 12. Giving an object or brand human characteristics is often used to create a bond between a product and its buyer; it allows the consumer to relate to the object. Take for example this Audi advert (see fig 3), the advert follows the very first streamlined Audi illustrated in a fairy tale fashion, showing how far Audis cars have come since the beginning. The music and the way the actors interact with the car humanise the vehicle. The techniques used in the adverts cleverly manipulate the spectator, making them understand how the object, in this case the car, is feeling. ‘We may remember or forget these images, but briefly we take them in, and for a minute they stimulate our imagination, either by way of memory or anticipation’ (ways of seeing, 1972) So although the advert may be forgotten it ‘stimulates our imagination’, speaking in a language which shows happiness being portrayed in an imaginary world, but showing to you that it could be reality if you purchase that product. ‘Speaks to us in a language we can recognise but a voice we can never identify’ Williamson, J (1978), page 14.

Advertising has managed to twist the consumer society into a vicious cycle of purchasing goods to keep their deemed-upon ‘glamorized’ lifestyle at an acceptable level, so they stay enviable, then introducing new products; cars, clothing etc. for the consumers to then re buy new products which are supposedly fashionable. ‘Promises and threatens, plays upon fear, often the fear of not being desirable, enviable.’ (Ways of seeing, 1972) As the saying goes, ‘Jump on the band wagon’, it seems a necessary and the safest option for everyone to almost copy one another, ‘well they’re doing it so we’ll do it as well’.
Money plays the biggest role in the advertising business, but with clever tricks people are convinced into spending their money for items which will keep them satisfied, until something else pops up. ‘Works on our anxieties about money, urging each of us to scramble competitively to get more’ (ways of seeing, 1972) What advertisers basically work upon is the fact that other than food and the important necessities needed, no one has anything else to spend their money on, so publicising an item for a better way of life and to get away from the normal is going to appeal to people.

The invention of television has had a huge impact in the role of advertising, with the advertisements being strategically placed during children’s TV because they know kids and their parents are going to be watching. ‘The child looks and recognizes before it can speak.’ Bergers, J (1972), page 07. Kids watching the adverts will pick up on the colours, the other children enjoying the toys and the upbeat tempo in which the advert is being sold. The use of familiar songs and characters from TV shows grabs the child’s attention making them happy, and with that happiness only temporary the child’s excitement will change into them wanting that specific product. Adverts play on the vulnerability of the child’s mind. It’s the same for adverts aimed at adults, take alcohol adverts for example; again, they’re strategically placed so they come on when that supposed audience watches TV. The adverts always involve friends, celebrations and having a good time. These clips stimulate the imagination so the next time you go to the shop to buy booze you’ll be subconsciously of the happiness of what this product has to offer.

Branding has a huge impact on the way in which customers view a product. Having high end brands and glamourizing yourself with the familiar brands is something which we do almost as a routine, but to familiarise ourselves with specific brands we have to be shown them first. To get a message or brand across an advert will constantly flash the logo or the specific colour schemes associated with their company into your head, be it through TV, billboards, posters, leaflets, shops etc. Take for example Coca Cola; it’s such a widespread brand which almost everybody knows about, wherever you are you always know it’s going to be a safe option. Adverts for Coca Cola have been able to drill a sense of happiness, family orientated and quality into us so we then attach these characteristics to the brand. A quote here which I disagree with, ‘Brands like coke have suffered so much adverse publicity, especially over the water scandal in India, that its behaviour has redefined the brand. Even given billion dollars of advertising, kids see it as a bad brand’ Arnold, C (2009) page 8. I believe that coke and other family brands don’t heavily rely on the billions of money put into their advertising, it’s more of how they are portrayed to the public, and with coke being portrayed with such a happy and positive attitude it’s hard to want to criticize it when something goes wrong.

Relying heavily on money and the ever changing development of technology and goods being produced, advertising manages to work its ever so convincing magic into making people buy goods for their believed benefit. Advertisers use devices such as celebrities, luxury vacations and quintessential desired necessities to target their specific audiences. With the mind set of individualism and the clever devises for manipulating their customers, advertisers have been able to flourish and build on the ever expanding consumer society in which we live in. People are always trying to reach the height of glamour, the need to display their enviable self to the world. Customers are forever chasing this highly glamourized ‘imaginary’ way of life, and as they are tricked into this misinterpretation of the necessity of products it’s hard to escape the cycle of purchasing these enviable and desired goods. As we are constantly bombarded with advert after advert it’s not surprising that we follow the path of misconception, it’s delivered to us as the norm, and why should people question it if it’s making them happy?








Bibliography

Arnold, C (2009) ‘Ethical Marketing and The New Customer’, England, John Wiley & Sons.

Berger, J (1972) ‘Ways of Seeing’, London, Penguin Books.

Berger, J (1972) Ways of Seeing – Advertising, www.youtube.com [web]

Bullmore, J. (1991) ‘More Bull More’, Oxfordshire, World Advertising Research Centre.

Williamson, J (1978) ‘Decoding Advertising’, London, Marion Boyars.

Fig 1 http:/2.bp.blogspot.com/lzeqasj3t2s/tzotv40iovi/AAAAAAAADK4/ynsk7ozhecy/s1600/adressrehearsel.jpg



Fig 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v61q1z0ynoa&feature=player_embedded
 

Thursday, 11 April 2013

OUGD401: Studio Brief 2: From Theory into Practice

A Brief History of...  

So from being briefed on the studio task I decided that I'd base my book on the history of the Skinhead movement. It was an area which interested me and I thought it was a culture which is very misunderstood and could be explained further. I'd aim my book at like minded designers interested in British history and culture.

This was my original concept:

For my publication I want to explore the Skinhead culture from 69'. I will look at the position of parliment, the differences in class due to economic circumstances and the progression of society and how it played a huge part in the way the Skinheads acted and lived. I want to explore the orginial Skinheads, before racism and far right parties started using the skinhead look.

 

After defining my idea we then had a crit which involved the class spliting into two groups and sharing your ideas with everybody. I got some brilliant feedback which resulted in me then changing up my idea.

Feedback:

Make it into a timeline?

Aim it at younger students?

Can you find enough information on the content?

What will be the point of it?

 After considering the feedback I decided to Look at Mods and Skins, two revolutionaries that were the beginning of the youth rebelion.    

Second Concept:

For my publication I want to explore the fashion, music and lifestyle of British youth in the 1960's, comparing this with the fashion, music and lifestyle of today's youth. I will pay direct attention to the subcultures of Mods and Skins. I will look at the position of parliament/ politics, the differences in class due to economic circumstances and the progression of society and how it played a huge part in the way the youth dressed, acted and lived during the 1960's, and compare with this to situation of today's society, economy and politics. My publication will be targeted at like minded designers of my age who are interested in British Culture and history. The design will be that of a zine, a free handout given when either purchasing clothes, or music.

Over easter I designed some ideas of how I wanted my book to look and did some research on Mods and Skinheads.

   



This was the original front cover for my book. The idea was that when you open up the book to read it it looks like you've got the parker jacket on.

 Double page spread:

 Heres proof of the original content i'd written [unfinished]. After the crit this content was scrapped.


 After easter we had another crit, in smaller groups, I was with Richard and four other students. The feedback i got was brilliant, although it gave me another direction in which I was going to take my publication

Feeback:

-Focus on more Subgenres, not just mods and skins.

-Write about how music and lifestyle has changed due to changes in society, talk about how its all ruled by money and developments in technology.

-Compare revolutionaries from the 60's and 70's to ones now. e.g. punks and hipsters.  

This is my final concept and the one I stuck with:

My publication will be a zine exploring the attitude towards music and lifestyle of subcultures in the 1960's - 70's, comparing this with the attitude towards music and lifestyle of today's subcultures. I will look at the position of parliament/ politics, the differences in class due to economic circumstances and the progression of society and how it played a huge part in the way the youth acted and lived during the 1960's and the music scenes which derived from this, and compare with this to situation of today's society, economy and politics and how it has effected music and subcultures. My publication will be targeted at students and young adults attending music gigs and aims to inform and entertain, and if mass produces would be given out at the end of a music event,

 

Research:

London Subcultures 1950-1980

Between 1950 and 1980, groups of young people defined themselves as different through their musical, fashion and lifestyle preferences.

These 'subcultures' usually expressed a deliberate opposition to established ideas of morality and public order. Disenchanted by the staid conventions of the older generation, young people demanded freedom to behave as they wished.
The confidence of youth was partly based on prosperity. Earnings increased by 70% between 1950 and 1970, and young people had disposable incomes to play with.

Teddy Boys and Girls
 
'Teds' were associated with the rise of rock and roll in the 1950s. Teddy dress was a version of Edwardian-era dress. Teddy boys wore knee-length drape coats with half-length velvet collars, suede shoes and elaborate bouffant hairstyles, a pastiche of the wealthy patrons of Saville Row.
Teddy Girls wore full dirndl or circular skirts decorated with large appliques, white fitted shirts, and scarves tied around their necks. Along with zoot-suited Hipsters and Greasers, Teds were associated with American-style rock and roll, and the British stars Tommy Steele, Adam Faith and Cliff Richard.

Mods
 
'Mods' or Moderns were fashion-conscious sharp dressers of the 1960s. Emerging in part from the jazz modernists of the 1950s, and partly from working-class traditions of competitive dressing, Mods aped the look of middle-class businessmen. They wore Italian-cut, custom-made suits from Cecil Gee and teamed them withpolo shirts and neat Vidal Sassoon haircuts. They rode Vespa motor scooters.
Young Mod women turned towards style icons such as the androgynous model Twiggy for inspiration. Frivolous or ladylike accessories were abandoned in favour of figure-hugging sweaters, mini-skirts and shift dresses.
Mods liked Black music and those who had grown up with newly settled West Indian neighbours adopted elements of Black styling and a taste for Jamaican Ska. London Mod bands of the 1960s included the Small Faces, The Who and The Kinks.

Reference: http://www.20thcenturylondon.org.uk/london-subcultures-1950-1980

Youth Culture & Fashion

London's role as the nation's capital of fashion was already centuries-old when the 20th century began. Fashionable dress, music and la mode behavior traditionally took their cue from London's royal court and its aristocratic salons. During the 20th century London's position as the place where fashions were set remained the same but the pacemakers changed. Fashions were now led by the young. From the bright young things of the 1920s dancing the Charleston to hot jazz; through to the punks of the 1970s pogo-ing to The Damned, the young assumed a new cultural importance in 20th century London.

London's size and class make-up was, as always, a factor. London had the largest working class in Europe and the combination of 'East End boys and West End girls' was a particularly potent one in the age of democracy and permissiveness. The transport revolution had brought London's West End within reach of all and as the infrastructure of clubs and dancing venues took shape from the 1920s onwards, so too did the democratic mixing of wealthy and workers. In the 1930s a journalist observed the crowds of East End young in Leicester Square's cafes and cinemas. 'I imagined when I first saw them that these people, so magnificently colourful and glossy and self-assured, must be very important and wealthy indeed.... But I found out that they were really very poor; that they invaded the West End in their tens of thousands only twice a week or so; that they spent next to nothing.'
Most of London's 20th century youth 'scenes' led a syncopated life between the West End and the suburbs. Although jazz became a craze for the wealthy young of Mayfair, it also thrived in large suburban ballrooms, such as the Hammersmith Palais de Danse, or Streatham Locarno. During the 1960s some of the most famous rhythm and blues venues were not in central London but in the western suburbs. Here, the crumbling ballroom on Eel Pie Island, and the Railway Hotel in Richmond, otherwise known as the Crawdaddy Club, were key places on the music scene.